Mr. Jones Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 I see some rifles equipped with their iron sights looking through a red dot, which is usually positioned halfway down the receiver.Is this effective? I can maybe see how it would provide an aperture effect, but it seems like it would be hell to line up quickly. Seems like it would be difficult to match the height of all three components.I do plan to try it out once I find a set of iron sights for the rifle, but in the meantime, Educate Me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longitude Zero Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Many shooters "co-witness" iron sights and optical sights. To each their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Microgunner Posted July 30, 2010 Report Share Posted July 30, 2010 Yeah, I don't like co-witnessing sights. That's why I prefer folding sights on rifles equipped with electronic sights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imschur Posted July 30, 2010 Report Share Posted July 30, 2010 Ive been toying with the co witnessing through my EOTech. I havent warmed up to it yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted July 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2010 Unfortunately, I have yet to find a compatable flip up front sight, can barely find a front sight at all... Problem is the mount:Here is the same front sight I keep finding anywhere I look:http://www.topgunsupply.com/sig-sauer-522-sight-set.htmlI have issue with these sights already, with no way to adjust the front height and the rear sight adjustment is freefloating with no repeatable settings or "clicks"The Sig 556 iron sights will work on this rifle. They are spring loaded flip up with some pretty intuitive controls for front and rear. But at $250 it's a little beyond what I really wanted to pay for iron sights. Still, I feel naked without them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imschur Posted July 31, 2010 Report Share Posted July 31, 2010 Im thinking based on the .22lr's range, Sig figures youll set'em and forget'em. That rear sight appears to be similar to a FAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longitude Zero Posted July 31, 2010 Report Share Posted July 31, 2010 Yeah, I don't like co-witnessing sights. That's why I prefer folding sights on rifles equipped with electronic sights.Me too. That is how my weapons are set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted July 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2010 Im thinking based on the .22lr's range, Sig figures youll set'em and forget'em. That rear sight appears to be similar to a FALThat is a good point, and truly I doubt I would ever need to adjust them under normal usage. But it's kinda like having headlight defrosters on your luxury sedan. You may never use them, barely ever think about them; but when you go to show it off to a friend, the first thing you show them is the fancy headlights ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellie_18 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 If you've fired enough rounds through a rifle with a red dot then you've noticed that you must keep the dot centered in the tube for consistant grouping. You must also maintain a consistant cheek weld. I myself don't cowitness my iron sights actually I ignore the front sight altogether and simply look through the rear apeture at the dot this forces me to center the dot and repeat my cheek weld without thinking about it.I shoot with both eyes open and while I can aquire a target slightly faster with a dot only I produce more accurate shots using the rear apeture with minimal lag in target aquisition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.