I've got both. What are you wondering, in particular? To me, the Sig feels like a real solid rifle while the S&W feels slightly "toyish", if that's a word. Probably due to the weight, it's real light because of the plastic lower. Still the S&W is an excellent shooter, and I have run a lot of rounds through mine with no issues (aside from the crappy golden bullet ammo not running well through it). :grin:
Out of vacation, with the SHOT show this past January and a couple weeks in Maine this summer, I've spent it all. Gotta work, only taking 2 days off. >:(
This person has no idea whatsoever of the wolves at their door. But, back to your original point, it's laughable and totally believable that these hypocritical pricks have the complete lack of fortitude, that they would sell ad space to the very industry they oppose.
Yup, I scoured this and saw on the inside rail line it was indeed stamped Magpul PTS. It will serve fine on the M&P 15-22. Since they refunded me half the purchase price, it will be fine. So, it feels different to hold, but seems like a good hold position for tactical handling. Even better that I'm trying it out on the 15-22, since it serves as kind of a trainer anyway.
I bought an AFG2 off Amazon, got an AFG1 from the company, called NORCO. Sent them a nasty email about the Gen1/Gen2 differences, they let me know they were told the models were the same, replied that they would send back half my purchase price. I said ok. :P
I've just been plinking steel silhouettes with mine, never tested it out for bullseye. I'll give it a whirl next time out. Do you have a scope on yours, or is that iron sights?